All New Bitdefender Internet Security 2012 – Review

Benign Editorial Team | Archive | 2012-05-15

Bitdefender Internet Security 2012 gained my interest when I read about its performance and saw its screen shots. This software is really an improved version of its sequels. In 2008, I tried “Total Protection” from Bitdefender and that really disappointed me. It had some network settings related bug due to which internet speed went down after the installation of that software. (Total Protection is an all in one security suite as claimed by the antivirus developer companies)

I have tested Bitedefender Internet Security 2012 and it proved to be the best antivirus application available today. av-test.org has ranked its previous version as No. 1 security software against malware and other computer related threats and this one has also proved itself as the best in the tests carried out by the folks inside their testing laboratory.

The identity of a good antivirus software is that it should consume very low system resources and must have high end protection accompanied with ease of usability. Bitdefender parallels all these three criteria and the resulting products are highly recommendable to be used.

New Bitdefender Internet Security 2012 introduced by the company has brand new interface with horizontally arranged categories of preventive tools. Auto-Pilot mode is a new feature introduced which has the ability to take over the full control of antivirus and automatically analyse and maintain the protection against newly discovered internet threats. This internet security has got a two way firewall to make a solid defense line against internet related threats. Other worthy features included are Antiphising and Antispam technologies, improved vulnerability scanner, social networking protection and parental control to filter out internet, improved Game Mode to minimize the interruption caused by antivirus while playing computer games.

I intend to give this software A+ grade.

Practical Notes

This topic continues to be useful because many readers reach it while trying to understand a specific symptom, comparison, or configuration step rather than browsing casually. When using older guidance, the safest approach is to separate the core principle from any product-era detail. The principle usually remains valuable even when model names, software versions, and market availability have changed.

For that reason, readers should verify device labels, ratings, compatibility notes, and safety instructions before applying a fix. If the article discusses batteries, chargers, or electrical connections, it is especially important to confirm capacity, voltage, and wiring assumptions in the actual equipment being used.

Readers looking for a broader context may also benefit from exploring related pages in the same category. Companion articles make it easier to compare troubleshooting ideas instead of relying on a single isolated explanation.

Practical Notes

Related Reading